Written by 
As communities across the nation celebrate their rich cultural heritage, a growing chorus of voices is urging a reexamination of traditional chieftaincy systems. Advocates of reform argue that while these institutions play a vital role in local governance and cultural preservation, they must adapt to contemporary societal needs.
In various states, traditional leaders-chiefs, kings and other hereditary figures-hold significant influence over local affairs. However, many are calling attention to issues such as lack of transparency, gender inequality and outdated practices that can hinder progress in local governance.
Traditional systems have served our communities for generations, but they must evolve to reflect modern values and needs. Many of these systems exclude women and younger generations from leadership roles, which are not sustainable in today’s world.
One striking example is the case of Oyo State where traditional rulers have significant authority over land use and community decisions. Recent clashes over land rights have raised questions about the accountability of these leaders. Local activists argue that with a system of checks and balances, disputes may escalate, harming community cohesion.
A recent survey conducted by the National Institute for Cultural Studies revealed that nearly 70 percent of respondents support some form of reform in traditional leadership structures.
In a rapidly changing world, the time may be ripe for traditional system to adapt, ensuring they remain relevant and beneficial for all citizens. The ongoing dialogue may well shape the future of chieftaincy in the nation, balancing the preservation of cultural identities with the imperatives of modern governance.
Zainab Jamiu, Ibadan
READ ALSO: Ondo guber: We’ll be transparent in distribution, inspection of sensitive materials — INEC