‘Crippling’ loss of millions of dollars in solar rebates under investigation

Bowen says he has asked the Clean Energy Regulator to do what it can within its statutory functions to assist businesses and other regulators investigating these companies.

“The Australian government expects all agents in this market to pay solar retailers properly,” Bowen says.

“Solar retailers are often small and medium businesses doing great work to accelerate our transition to renewable energy.”

How the rebate works

When rooftop solar is installed on a home, the consumers earn “small-scale technology certificates” based on the size of the system that serve as a rebate on the purchase price of their panels. In practice, they receive an upfront discount from the retailer or installer if they surrender their solar certificates to the retailer or their nominated agent.

Under federal laws to encourage renewables, electricity retailers must buy these certificates and surrender them to the regulator every quarter. (They can also buy “large-scale generation certificates” for big renewable projects).

Managing and trading the certificates is complex, so an industry of middlemen has sprung up. Most retailers use a registered agent, also known as a solar aggregator, which bundles the certificates together and sells them to the companies that need to buy them. The agents normally repay the retailers promptly.

Australia’s rooftop solar rollout is the most successful in the world, contributing more than 11 per cent of the nation’s total energy supply. In 2023, the solar certificates funded rebates for 330,000 systems across Australia.

The Clean Energy Regulator is involved only at the start and end of the process. It checks that the system installation, creation of the certificates and assignation to an agent has occurred correctly at one end, and that liable entities have surrendered the correct number of certificates at the other. Overseeing the part in the middle where retailers engage agents is, a spokesperson says, not the regulator’s job.

“The [regulator] understands and shares concern about the stress this causes small business, however the use of agents and any associated contractual matters, including those of [certificate] price and payment are outside the legislative remit of the [regulator],” the spokesperson says.

The spokesperson said the regulator had referred matters to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and various state and territory consumer authorities.

The collapse of Emerging Energy Solutions

The most dramatic event to rock the solar rebate scheme is the collapse of Melbourne-based aggregator Emerging Energy Solutions, trading as GROUPSOLARBUY.COM.AU.

The company went into liquidation in July owing $107.03 million to 256 trade creditors, including hundreds of solar retailers as well as big companies such as BP. The updated liquidators’ report dated October 23 shows creditors are owed from a few thousand dollars to millions.

The liquidators, Graeme Beattie and Matthew Kucianski at Worrells, identified links between the collapsed company and two other companies: Greenbot and NetZero Environmental Group. They were all agents trading solar certificates, and Greenbot also had a software platform used by other companies including Emerging Energy Solutions.

Loading

The reasons for the company’s failure, the liquidators’ report says, include “adverse legal action, lack of financial control/poor record keeping, unprofitable trading, and possible phoenix activity/disposition of assets”.

Emerging Energy Solutions was owned by a holding company that in turn was owned by two brothers, Mohammad and Ali Sayed, who were also employed by Emerging Energy Solutions. Mohammad Sayed is also a director of Greenbot.

The liquidators found Mohammad Sayed may have been a “shadow director” of Emerging Energy Solutions, meaning he was not formally a director but acted like one. The Sayed brothers have a claim for $383,103 in annual leave listed in the company debts and usually employees are treated as priority creditors, but the shadow directorship could exclude them from this benefit.

The liquidators also identified more than $18 million of the creditors’ claims are from Greenbot and NetZero Environmental Group, which they believe are related parties.

The liquidators’ report says the company’s business and assets, including millions of dollars’ worth of renewable certificates, may have been transferred to related parties, in what could be “illegal phoenix activity”.

The liquidators identified a significant number of transfers and payments to third parties that may be legally voidable. These included an unexplained one-off payment of $100,000 to Ali Sayed, an unexplained payment of $218,075 to RecTraders (of which Ali Sayed is the sole director), and $139.36 million in unknown payments.

The report says the Westpac overdraft facility for Emerging Energy Solutions had a debt of $4.48 million and this was transferred to NetZero Environmental Group upon the request of Ali Sayed.

The liquidators’ report says the sole director of NetZero Environmental Group is Ahmad Reshad Ali Ahmadi, who they believe was formerly employed by Emerging Energy Solutions. The liquidators also found the principal place of business for Emerging Energy Solutions was owned by two people with the surname Ahmadi, suggesting another possible link.

Beattie says he is trying to minimise the impact on smaller creditors by seeking funding from larger creditors to continue investigations, including public examinations of key players in court.

“I commonly see the stress and uncertainty caused by the failure of major companies on small creditors who are often family-owned small businesses,” Beattie says. “I empathise with all creditors.”

If creditor funding is not forthcoming, Beattie says, it would be up to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to pursue the matter.

Greenbot’s suspension

Lee says she used Greenbot as her agent for years without any problems. When $40,311 was outstanding from Greenbot, the payments stopped and one day she logged onto the platform to find that the reseller was listed as NetZero Environmental Group instead. Then she was locked out.

Months later, Greenbot has not paid up. The cost of a lawsuit would probably exceed the debt.

The Clean Energy Regulator tried to suspend Greenbot from the scheme in June, but the Federal Court granted a stay and allowed it to continue operating from July to October pending an upcoming case. Greenbot could also seek a review of the suspension in the Administrative Review Tribunal.

Lee says the regulator was told of issues back in January, but took until May to investigate, exacerbating the damage to the industry. The regulator did not address this claim directly.

Loading

Greenbot, NetZero Environmental Group and Emerging Energy Solutions are facing multiple lawsuits from disgruntled retailers.Their collective market share fell to 1 per cent in September.

As well as the links identified by the liquidators’ report, ASIC records show the three companies share multiple current and former addresses, in both the CBD and suburbs of Melbourne. A fourth company, HELLO SOLAR, also has links to two of these addresses, and retailers are taking to social media to warn each other not to deal with this company.

NetZero Environmental Group and HELLO SOLAR are still registered agents, and the regulator said it could not comment on whether it was investigating.

Ali Sayed confirmed Mohammad was his brother and promised to respond to this masthead in writing but did not. None of the other companies or directors responded.

As Lee sees it, the viability of the solar industry is at stake, yet no one is taking responsibility: “If this isn’t addressed it leaves the whole system open to the same players or other players continuing to take advantage of what is effectively a loophole in the scheme.”

Get to the heart of what’s happening with climate change and the environment. Sign up for our fortnightly Environment newsletter.