Revenue from operations in the reported quarter stood at Rs 693.50 crore, up 14% over Rs 608.04 crore posted by the company in the corresponding quarter of the previous financial year.
On a sequential basis, PAT jumped 120% versus Rs 312.63 crore reported by the company in Q1FY25. Meanwhile, the revenue jumped 66% over Rs 417.82 crore reported in the April-June quarter.
Interest income rose to Rs 205 crore versus Rs 186 crore in Q2FY24 and Rs 162 crore in Q1FY25.
The company’s net worth as of September 30, 2024, stood at Rs 1,37,144 crore while its assets under management (AUM) was reported at Rs 1,206 crore.
JFSL increased its stake in Jio Payments Bank to 82.17% in August 2024. There were 15 lakh CASA customers and it expanded the business correspondents network to 3,000. The expansion will continue, the company filing to the exchanges said.Read more: Bajaj Housing Finance shares in focus ahead of Q2 results todayThe pre-provisioning operating profit or PPoP in the reported quarter stood at Rs 552 crore, which was up by 2.7% versus Rs 537 crore in Q2FY24 and 63% over Rs 339 crore in Q1FY25.
Jio Insurance Broking
The company has direct-to-customer product portfolio of 24 plans across four product categories viz. auto, two-wheeler, health and life. Its institutional product suite includes Group Term Life, Group Medical Cover, Group Personal Accident and Commercial Insurance.
On a standalone basis, PAT in the July-September quarter stood at Rs 305 versus Rs 89 crore in Q2FY24, which is a 242% rise. On a sequential basis, the PAT surged by over 323% from Rs 72 crore reported in Q1FY25.
Meanwhile, total standalone income stood at Rs 383 crore up from Rs 149 crore in Q2FY24 and Rs 134 crore in Q1FY25, recording a 157% YoY and 186% QoQ jump.
The earnings were announced after market hours and Jio Financial Services shares on Friday ended at Rs 330.55 on the NSE, gaining by Rs 1.30 or 0.39% over Thursdayโs closing price.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)