Written by 
Super Typhoon Pepito, with sustained winds of over 215 kilometers per hour, brought devastation across the Philippines, leaving destruction in its wake. As of the latest data, the series of typhoons this month, including Pepito has claimed 160 lives, injured 500 individuals, and displaced nearly 2.5 million people. The storm’s fury was particularly felt in Central Luzon and Cagayan Valley, where entire communities were submerged due to overflowing rivers. Flooding reached record levels, with some areas experiencing waters as deep as 10 feet, forcing tens of thousands to seek refuge in evacuation centers. However, overcrowding in these shelters further compounded the crisis, exposing evacuees to waterborne diseases like leptospirosis and cholera.
The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) reported that Pepito caused PHP 75 billion in damages, with infrastructure alone accounting for PHP 50 billion. Roads, bridges, and highways vital for connecting communities were either washed away or rendered impassable by landslides. In Isabela, the Magat Bridge collapsed, isolating several towns and delaying relief operations by days. In Metro Manila, urban flooding disrupted transportation networks, leaving hundreds of vehicles stranded and millions of pesos lost in productivity. Energy infrastructure was also severely affected, as downed power lines left 8 million households without electricity for up to two weeks. Telecommunications companies reported massive outages, making coordination of relief efforts challenging.
The agricultural sector bore the brunt of the storm, suffering an estimated PHP 25 billion in losses. Rice paddies and cornfields—many of which were nearing harvest—were completely destroyed. In Nueva Ecija, known as the “Rice Granary of the Philippines,” over 70% of farmlands were wiped out. The Department of Agriculture estimated that more than 100,000 farmers and fishers lost their primary sources of income. Such devastation in agriculture exacerbates the nation’s food insecurity, driving up prices and compounding inflationary pressures.
Comparisons with previous super typhoons provide insight into the recurring disasters faced by the Philippines. Below is a comparison of Pepito’s impacts with those of Haiyan (2013) and Odette (2021):
| Typhoon | Year | Wind Speed (kph) | Casualties | Damages (PHP) | Key Impacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haiyan (Yolanda) | 2013 | 315 | 6,300+ | 95 billion | Massive storm surges flattened coastal cities |
| Odette (Rai) | 2021 | 195 | 400+ | 51 billion | Widespread flooding, uprooted power systems |
| Pepito | 2024 | 215 | 300+ | 75 billion | Infrastructure destruction, agricultural losses |
Pepito’s death toll was lower than Haiyan’s catastrophic 6,300 fatalities, but its widespread destruction of infrastructure and agricultural productivity closely mirrors the impact of Odette. All three storms revealed systemic vulnerabilities in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.
Despite advancements in early warning systems by PAGASA, including the issuance of timely alerts, many local governments struggled to mobilize effective evacuation measures. A study by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies revealed that only 60% of LGUs have updated disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) plans, leaving vulnerable areas ill-prepared. The overcrowding in evacuation centers and the lack of adequate facilities exposed the gaps in preemptive risk reduction.
Relief operations were hampered by logistical challenges, with aid arriving late in remote areas. The bottlenecks highlighted inefficiencies in coordination between national agencies and LGUs. Reports indicate that at least 40% of affected families in isolated municipalities received no government assistance during the critical first week after the storm.
The economic impact of Pepito extended beyond immediate damages. According to the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), the typhoon disrupted economic activities worth an estimated PHP 30 billion. Small and medium enterprises in flooded urban areas suffered significant losses, with many unable to reopen due to damage to equipment and facilities. Insurance companies processed over PHP 10 billion in claims, straining the financial sector. The typhoon also caused an estimated 0.5% reduction in GDP growth for the fourth quarter of 2024, delaying economic recovery efforts already challenged by global uncertainties.
Pepito’s devastation serves as a grim reminder of the increasing frequency and intensity of super typhoons, a phenomenon tied to climate change. A report from the Climate Change Commission noted that the Philippines experienced a 20% increase in extreme weather events over the past decade, with warming ocean temperatures fueling more powerful storms. The country’s enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 75% by 2030. However, the Philippines remains heavily reliant on coal, which accounted for over 58% of the energy mix in 2023.
Critics point out that while the Climate Change Act of 2009 laid a legislative foundation for addressing climate risks, implementation remains inconsistent. A 2022 audit revealed that only 12% of LGUs had completed and operationalized their Local Climate Change Action Plans (LCCAPs). Financing remains a critical barrier, with the country requiring an estimated PHP 1 trillion for comprehensive climate adaptation measures by 2030.
Pepito’s aftermath underscores the urgent need for integrating DRRM and climate action. Preemptive measures such as flood control infrastructure, retrofitting buildings to withstand strong winds, and relocating communities from high-risk areas require political will and sustained funding. Community-based programs must be strengthened, empowering local populations to take proactive roles in disaster preparedness.
The government must also enhance international cooperation to secure funding and technical support for climate adaptation. The Philippines received USD 500 million from the Green Climate Fund in 2023, but this pales in comparison to the estimated USD 10 billion needed annually to combat the impacts of climate change effectively.
As the Philippines continues to bear the brunt of climate-induced disasters, the lessons from Pepito are clear: a reactive approach is no longer sufficient. Investment in proactive, integrated solutions is essential to safeguard lives, protect critical infrastructure, and ensure sustainable development in the face of a changing climate. Pepito’s fury must serve as a turning point for a nation standing at the frontline of climate vulnerability.